How is the man thinking.

GuestSide >> THE MAN

Partners

aquaristics

therapy

massage

windows, doors

GuestSide 2006-2008 by WPM©

given age, his scientific knowledge is reflected. The question, now already only it, what we compare it to how the statement, the content message of a hypothesis? When we talk about people, then mostly from the opinion of persons like that there is a word, who are the world's norms, and their statements are announced based on most beneficial points of view for them. From this we may see it clearly, that what kind of complicated, and how many objectives (from person independent) a writing depends on a factor, the content of a thought, and his outlook. This approach manner in that manner would enter sporting event, it is you that the world is his norm his etalon (authentic measure), what everything like that is onto a thing can be related, that this norm bears his tickets.

The other norm, which is the world's high, is superior to the man's the God's norm, which eliminates all those, the distortions, abnormalities, that in the world's can be found. This norm can be acquired, and can be lived, but for the modern man innumerable limitations like that (ethical and intellectual) contains, that makes it unpopular for the secular observer. At it rather since slogans like this control our life, than the: "Take the management of your fate in your hand!", or "Get it because you have the right to this!", we may not be surprised at the fact that the people's majority rejects the divine norm, which trains his follower to the sober, moderate life, then. Let us examine some things that may make it clear for us, how the world's norm originates from where? Why is it important that we recognize the norm that is superior to the world's?

............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

The world's norm.

To it, it is necessary to clear up what the world reports first in order for us to be allowed to understand the meaning of the expression word in this context? Even everyday, we look at it in a biblical sense even, the world word the land, and the on him living person reports it. Setting out from this the world's norm, or his ghost marks the norms that define it between the people working speech and behaviorial patterns. There is nothing till then with this with me in that manner trouble, while it does not turn out that there is not something totally properly.

I believe it, most with a fear and with anxiety fills it, the progressing direction, with which day, than day confront the media by favour of. Growing delinquency, illnesses, epidemics, wars, famines, natural disasters, environmental pollution, the hatred, insensitivity and the ethical norms rapid him being depreciated. Whether we, or who brings about these states? It may be our first thought that we ourselves make our life difficult with the causing of the honed listed phenomena. This is in this manner effectively, but ...! But let us not forget that there is somebody, for who it, his interest, that tear because of a God, and let him jerk us into the eternal death. And, if we deny it God, attained his aim already then. This the somebody not somebody else, than on Satan, the old snake, the devil, the Bible designates him.

Many people say it, does not exist, according to other ones: "The evil residing in us on Satan". Did he manage to make it believe that he does not exist with us? Yeah! But we look at it, how we may assure ourselves of his existence on Satan? I believe it, it was found out already: through the Bible! Naturally these evidences, only for them important (expectably), who do not deny a God's existence on a ground level, and they relate to the Bible as a God's word. I suggest it, let him take it out if he has a Bible and let him observe the train of thought in that manner.

Why the Bible?

Whether, the writing of the Bible in times from where the man knew that he needs a God? From where his knowledge, or only suspected that he is God? What made the man to it, that the an idol guessed gods by way of himself adores it? The person who accepts it as the one creating the evolution cuts his felling axe into hard tree, with what according to it: there is not a God and there is not creation. The question after these it: if there is not a god really, then from where knows that he is and has to deny it? Why turns to it for help if there is not a God, expresses his gratitude to him and chides it, everybody his temper. It is not possible to talk about it if there is not something! He has to exist if he talks about him! Does he not see it? The gravitation, the radio waves, the electricity, the various radiations, does not sees deny their existence after all. Does not see the launched slug, dies of the encounter after all. These phenomena were not known before with 300 years, they were not able to talk about them. The garbage washes it, let him look out on the sky, let him look at the animals, the plants, the insects, let him look at his own creations! A God may help him only already if these all say that there is not a God.

We examine it after this little one warming up why dot the Bible?

For who the Bible is only a story-book are for others interesting reading, again for others a book, which was written in order that he divides the world. There are ones like that, according to who meaningless bilgewater, but there are people, who the Bible are, the words of a God , and it in this book wrote down their life is lived. Which approach is the correct one?

The proof of the pudding is in the eating. -- I presuppose it, that all of them we know it the life is valid for many of his areas considering this expression and his essence. There may be an area like this in the Bible written down -- not the historical, historical content -- the test of laws, guides. The peoples' majority accepts it, submits himself to the state, ethical, ethic laws and it does not occur to him meanwhile that these laws are his bases they derive from the Bible. Conspicuous, that the laws of our days observing the world's outlook, generally certain group (reason) keeping his interests before an eye, on a specific manner can be interpreted and like that, than the plastic pants.

Naturally the next evidences, who do not deny a God's existence on a ground level are important to them only, and the Bible is accepted as a God's word. I suggest it, let him take it out if he has a Bible and let him observe the train of thought in that manner.

Moses, the genesis wrote it down graphically in the book of the posterity, Adam and Eves' contact with a God, the creator. The intimate contact was interrupted after the couple's rebellion, and our ancestors found their way under his influence on Devil with completeness. This did not mean that it is a man, a brainwashing however forgot the Eden definitively, and his of that place memories. Although the reports do not mention whether Adam and Eves talked about a God to their children, but the indirect evidences indicate it, that yes, since they had successors like that, who devout persons they were.

Genesis according to the 26. poem of 4. chapter: "And to Seth, to him also a son hath been born, and he calleth his name Enos; then a beginning was made of preaching in the name of Jehovah." Adam was 130 year one at this time as soon as the Bible writes it down, that is we have been to 130. year after his creation.

Genesis 5. chapter 22. poem: "And Enoch walketh habitually with God after his begetting Methuselah three hundred years, ..." Adam, were 622 year already at this time.

Genesis 6. chapter 9. poem: "..., Noah `is' a righteous man; perfect he hath been among his generations; with God hath Noah walked habitually." Adam, were 726 of years dead already.

As soon as he emerges from the above reports apparently, a rebellion did not mean it because of the God truth full separation, yet less it, that a God does not exist. You are from what it is possible to deduce that it is not his chance work that there is a God picture, which everybody accepts based on his temper and his conscience, in the man rejects. The Bible, independently the rejection of the inspiration, authenticity, or in the look of his acceptance, a written evidence of his it, that the man is not looking for it accidentally God. Later, the deficiency of the God's knowledge it induced a man toward it, that himself prepared it, let an idol adore gods. In as much God, in Good Book wrote down we compare it with the gods created by the man, deities on his basis, we may discover a visible difference then. He has a name, with which it is distinct, for the man's gods, without an exception all the others. Where was disappearing from the Bible a God's name? Is the name important according to you?

>> more

Genesis 2. chapter 19. poem:

"And Jehovah God formeth from the ground every beast of the field, and every fowl of the heavens, and bringeth in unto the man, to see what he doth call it; and whatever the man calleth a living creature, that `is' its name."

We imagine what kind of chaos there would be, if country the living beings would have a different name. How a plant identification guide would meet with difficulties, or an animal, an insect the completion of an encyclopaedia. As soon as we may see it the Bible implies indispensable documentations, that the man, it is made on the number area of his life-nem likes, into obliged attention to have bought. Presumably, this one of the reasons of the fact that the modern man, own one is superiority interpret the Bible as arising against his deity status nearly, and its author, God. The person who denies a God's existence, the authenticity of the Bible, his inspiration observes the enemy of the universal order, the lord of the chaos, the Satan apparently.

Is the snake identical with the Satan?

On Satan (devil) the meaning of a word: rebel, adversary, the accuser.

The Genesis the 1. poem of 3. chapter writes this:

"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, ..."

It from a basis I presuppose that nobody thinks of the absurdity that the snake spoke really with a shock rather acceptable it, that on Satan, from his conditions gave rise to an effect like that budding, as if the snake would speak. The fact that Eva did not find the speaking snake strange, in that direction gives to deduce, that primarily the they were audible, and the opportunity: "you will be like that, than God, ..." they absorbed his attention.

The evidence of the identity.

In the 20. chapter of the book of the apparitions according to the 2. poem:

"And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, ..."

In this poem John apostle, talks about an ancestor snake, which is obvious, indicating the snake of the garden of Eden, and as a devil, Satan identifies it. As soon as we may see the snake of the garden of Eden he managed to identify it. We will see that we get the answer to the rest of the questions because of a God if there is enough perseverance in us.

From where originates and real this?

In the 28. chapter of Ezekiel book the 12-15. his poems announce a description, which shows who he was on Satan before his heart is a haughty Latvian because of his beauty,:

"Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."

In the continuation, the 17. poem says this:

"Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee."

King of Tyrus is mentioned in the 12. poem, we read this in the 17. poem though: "I will cast thee to the ground, ...", what is meaningless in an earthly king's case, since he rules over the land. That is who the poem calls king of Tyrus will be thrown on the land on Satan, that for the book of the apparitions 12. chapter, we may read in his 9. poem: "And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." - it emerged from this poem, that on Satan and his angels (demons) they were banished onto the land, which is a deathly threat with regard to us,. In the strange dog it, that most of his deaths the advanced age, illness, or as a result of an accident soon or late ensues, but that death, that on Satan (a world's norm) his following present, the eternal death.

Additional important additive in the 13. poem: "Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God," and Adam and Eva were only two earthly beings in Eden as soon as he emerges from the Bible. In this manner obvious, that king of Tyrus name, only a simile. The Bible mentions king of Tyrus in 54 cases, his richness and his splendour raised it above the then, earthly kings, and much later edge, than Adam and Eves, and may not have been in this manner in Eden.

In the 14. poem an newer indicating his predecessor on Satan: "Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth, ...", - in the Bible the cherubim the carriers of a God's throne, and the supporters of a God's majesty.

In the 15. poem indicating his rebellion on Satan: "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.", Jesus said this about the Satan for the Jews John apostel in the 44. poem of 8. chapter wrote down: "Ye are of your father the devil, ... He was a murderer from the beginning, ...,for he is a liar, and the father of it." - a newer evidence of his in that direction, that on Satan killing, and a liar was caught because of beginning. The homicide Adam and Eves proven apparently since he lost it as the consequence of his sedition (and all of their descendants) the eternal life. But there is a notable expression in this poem yet, the: from the beginning, and we fall into a trap easily if we are not cautious properly. Why? Many people may interpret the expression in that manner, that God for a liar, created the Satan for evil, although here entirely from something else there is a word. In a present case the an expression means it from the beginning, that started because of the moment that we may read in the 17. poem: "Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness." - that is on Satan, a God applied for his place. His spirituality directs us really as soon as the world's today's state proves it. Additional, Bible poems proving his existence on Satan: Job book, 1. chapter the 6-12. poems, and the 2. chapter the 1-6. spreading poems.

Really the Earth (this world) his god?

John apostle for the book of the apparitions 12. chapter, 7-9. write the vision down in this manner in lasting poems:

"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels. And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him."

I reckon that the above poems relate something like that, which makes it unambiguous on Satan, and casting his demons out from the daughter-in-law. Good, good! - it was cast out, but where Latvian, and in how much this affects us? - we may ask it. Legitimate the raising a question, let us turn to a God for this again, and we apply to it with newer Bible quotes "the where?", and "the what this means to us?" onto questions the answer.

The 12. poem of 12. chapter tells it to the book of the apparitions in this manner: "Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time." - in that manner with me this clear speech, and an it may be obvious before us already with little logic that this event makes it clear before everybody, that the ruler of the Earth was on Satan.

Our enemy, or our helper?

Let us translate our attention Peter onto ones written to an apostle's 1. letter in the 8. poem of 5. chapter. It is necessary to see that danger, that on Satan and his demons report: "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour: - here already it obvious, that the devil, our fierce enemy." Is not satisfied with this however, wants to gobble us up. How let us understand this? Let us think about what we began our adventures with? - with the world's norm (with his ghost). If we examine our related things with the life, thinking our manner, to discover our trend and identities with the ghost of the world written down in the above ones with us, we are in trouble then because we are his servants on Satan. I believe it are like that, who this does not disturb a drop.

How does he lead us astray?

Reads the undermentioned letter and let him decide!

The banned a God's answer.

The people asks the representatives of the religions often: why allows that much suffering and trouble if there is a God, that hits our world, in him the many innocent men and child? The undermentioned interview gives an apt answer onto the question. The undermentioned interview gives an apt answer onto the question. An interview was prepared with a known, American clergyman's girl in one of the radio programs in which the newswoman asked him about the terrible events of the latter times: How may a God have allowed one like this to happen?

The interviewee gave a deep, answer being evidence of acumen:

I believe it in that manner, God what happens to us saddens it though since decades very much we call it him: be out of our schools, from our government, and depart from our life. And he, the kind gentleman, withdrew silently. How may we expect a God to give his blessing and his protection if we call on it to leave us in peace in one?

O. H. (who was murdered, his body was found recently) complained that he does not want paryer in our schools, and we said it, properly.

Somebody said it afterwards, right, if we do not read the Bible in our schools: the Bible, which says it,: not kill, do not steal and like your fellow-man, than yourself. And we said it, we do not read it properly.

Dr. B. S. said it afterwards, let us not spank our children if they behave badly because their little personality is injured, and we may demolish their self-esteem (Dr. B. S. son was suicidal). And we said it, a specialist knows it for sure, what talks about, and we said it, properly do not spank.

Somebody said it after the teachers and the form master are right if our children are not disciplined when they behave chaotically. And the school's leaders said that the teachers should not touch the students rather, in case let us make a bad advertisement with this for the school, and we want us to be sued in no way. And we said it, properly do not discipline.

Somebody said it afterwards, we let our schoolgirls to have an abortion made, if want, and this does not have to be told to their parents. And we said it, let him be an abortion properly.

A wise leader said it afterwards since the boys are boys, and it will be done anyway, give boy for our students as many condoms as are wanted, and they do not have to report on this to their parents. And we said it, let them not sound properly.

Afterwards somebody, it by way of us onto a considerable position chose said that it does not count what we make in the privacy if we do our work. Agreeing with them again, we said it, does not count, what somebody makes (including the president) in the privacy, while our work and the economy are well works.

Somebody proceeded in this admiration continually afterwards, and published naked children's pictures, took a step then yet, and made these available on the internet. And we said it properly, the right of the free proverb makes this possible for them.

The entertainment industry said it afterwards, make TV programs and films, that the violence, the immorality and the prohibited sex are advertised. And let us prepare music uptakes like that, that encourage onto the rape, onto the drug consumption, onto the murder, onto the suicide and the different satanic topics are digested. And we said it, this only entertainment, he does not have bad influence, and nobody takes it seriously otherwise, so that, let them be going only.

We ask ourselves the question though now: why our children's conscience is not, why a difference cannot be made good and between bad one, and why does not cause a problem for them in order for the strangers to be killed, their classmates, themselves? Possibly, if he burns long and we are thinking about him firmly, we can find it out. I believe it, rather much everything has something to do with the saying that what the man sows harvests it.

"Kind God! - why you did not save the little girl who was killed in the class? With respect, killed student.

And the answer?

Kind killed student! Access is refused to me from the school. With respect: God."

Strange, what kind of it is easy for people to reject, to kick a God out, for bilgewater, to consider his message senselessness, they are surprised next, why the world goes into the hell.

Strange, how we believe what the newspapers write, but we question what the Bible says.

Strange, how somebody may say it I believe in a God while who knows that there is a God anyway observes the Satan!

Strange, that what kind of we are inclined to the judgement quickly, and how much not the judging.

Strange, what kind of we send it on quickly the jokes a thousand and they expand as brush fire in the public consciousness, but the people thinks it over two times if we do this with the messages being about the lord before it would be sent on..

Strange, that the immoral, obscene, rough and vulgar things they stream freely on the global network, while from the God truth public speech it is oppressed in the schools and on the workplaces.

Strange, how somebody may be a Sunday flaming for Christ and an invisible Christian in the weekdays.

Strange, that better interests, what the people says about me, than it, what a God says how from me!

Are you thinking?

Let us be thinking! - really only the evil dwelling in us on Satan? If from an above letter only a statement is true for you, should be thinking then. Would he like to be freed from his captivity? Everybody his life, his actions, may draw the conclusions based on his mentality. Would a God like to recognize his norm? This cognition of his may be the first step towards it, if Moses accepts it 5. book, 30. chapter offered an opportunity in 19. poem:

"I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live".

Bind an association with a God, test it! Do not be late if you decided, recognize it God, his intention, and the with us his related plans. If you accept a God's extended hand, and you do not keep it to be ashamed for truth your faith, or your question only is, establish the contact with me then.

Egyedi keresés

How is the man thinking

At the time of talking over the God arguments in all cases, we approached from the side of our human sights the God's affirmative, or towards his denial, we examine the opportunity of as what it would be possible to resolve it with a God now and opposite the Bible hostilities. Naturally, this only an experiment, that largely the recipient (visitor) the function of his spirituality.

We have to think that everything philosophical impresses it onto approaching strongly before an eye always his stamp the subject (person) his trend. Being afraid in this manner bar, but we may declare it, that the opinions, definitions, not only the person's social situation, but the spirituality of the

Interests.

Fossils causing hard thinking.

The scholars explain the last stages of the man's development in that manner, that from Homo habilis grew the Homo erectus, and it though the homo sapiens. Two fossil residues, the examination of which turned out on his row, were found in Kenya recently, that considered a man's ancestors Homo habilis and Homo erectus, live in the same age. According to one of Meave Leakey, the report's authors: This discovery refutes it the evolutionist idea, that the Homo erectus from Homo habilis grew.

How accurate the C14 (radiocarbon) dating method?

People who ask about carbon-14 (14C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of yearscarbon dating can only give thousands of years. People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history.

This works in the case of things that lived once only apparently, and example which cannot be used onto the definition of the age of rocks.

How the Carbon Clock Works?

Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on earth. Familiar to us as the black substance in charred wood, as diamonds, and the graphite in lead pencils, carbon comes in several forms, or isotopes. One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms: carbon-14, or 14C, or radiocarbon. Outside the range of recorded history, calibration of the 14C "clock is not possible.

"Bad" Dates.

When a date differs from that expected, researchers readily invent excuses for rejecting the result. The common application of such posterior reasoning shows that radiometric dating has serious problems. Woodmorappe cites hundreds of examples of excuses used to explain bad dates.

There are many examples where the dating methods give dates that are wrong for rocks of known age. One example is K-Ar dating of five historical andesite lava flows from Mount Nguaruhoe in New Zealand. Although one lava flow occurred in 1949, three in 1954, and one in 1975, the dates range from less than 0.27 to 3.5 Ma.

Australopithecus ramidus

For example, researchers applied posterior reasoning to the dating of Australopithecus ramidus fossils. Most samples of basalt closest to the fossil-bearing strata give dates of about 23 Ma (Mega annum, million years) by the argon-argon method. The authors decided that was too old, according to their beliefs about the place of the fossils in the evolutionary grand scheme of things. So they looked at some basalt further removed from the fossils and selected 17 of 26 samples to get an acceptable maximum age of 4.4 Ma. The other nine samples again gave much older dates but the authors decided they must be contaminated and discarded them. That is how radiometric dating works. It is very much driven by the existing long-age world view that pervades academia today.

The primate skull known as KNM-ER

A similar story surrounds the dating of the primate skull known as KNM-ER 1470. This started with an initial 212 to 230 Ma, which, according to the fossils, was considered way off the mark (humans weren't around then"). Various other attempts were made to date the volcanic rocks in the area. Over the years an age of 2.9 Ma was settled upon because of the agreement between several different published studies (although the studies involved selection of good from bad results, just like.

However, preconceived notions about human evolution could not cope with a skull like 1470 being that old. A study of pig fossils in Africa readily convinced most anthropologists that the 1470 skull was much younger. After this was widely accepted, further studies of the rocks brought the radiometric age down to about 1.9 Maagain several studies confirmed this date. Such is the dating game.

Many Physical Evidences Contradict the Billions of Years

1. Red blood cells and hemoglobin have been found in some (unfossilized!) dinosaur bone. But these could not last more than a few thousand yearscertainly not the 65 Ma since the last dinosaurs lived, according to evolutionists.

2. he earth's magnetic field has been decaying so fast that it looks like it is less than 10,000 years old. Rapid reversals during the flood year and fluctuations shortly after would have caused the field energy to drop even faster.

3. Radioactive decay releases helium into the atmosphere, but not much is escaping. The total amount in the atmosphere is 1/2000th of that expected if the universe is really billions of years old. This helium originally escaped from rocks. This happens quite fast, yet so much helium is still in some rocks that it has not had time to escapecertainly not billions of years.

4. Salt is entering the sea much faster than it is escaping. The sea is not nearly salty enough for this to have been happening for billions of years. Even granting generous assumptions to evolutionists, the sea could not be more than 62 Ma years oldfar younger than the billions of years believed by the evolutionists. Again, this indicates a maximum age, not the actual age.

Conclusion

There are many lines of evidence that the radiometric dates are not the objective evidence for an old earth that many claim, and that the world is really only thousands of years old. We don't have all the answers, but we do have the sure testimony of the Word of God to the true history of the world.

>> more